Oh boy, I'm going to get a lot of hate for this, but it needs to be said. In the first chapter of "The Great Gatsby", Tom comments on the downfall of the white race seem racist and "insane"... right? Well, no. Yes, his comment is racist, however that doesn't mean that this comment is not without some grain of truth. Today we commonly hear that the U.S. is a "melting pot" where all cultures from around the world can share ideas, culture, and food. This is not a common sentiment just among Democrats either, many Republicans fall into this same ideological trap. In reality, the United States was originally built for white people and later the African Americans wrongly enslaved.
After our country became a "global powerhouse", all of a sudden our country gained some "responsibility" to take care of other countries problems, especially places like Mexico or Central America. When their economies collapse and crime rates go up from government corruption, somehow the responsibility shifts from the lawmakers in those countries to the United States. Because of this, many people from other countries simply claim that they are seeking refuges to try and get out of those countries and move into our nice, well-maintained country.
"But what does this have to do with Tom's comment?" you may be asking yourself. Simply adding more immigrants from other countries shouldn't lower the population too much, but as exponential quantities of immigrants are abusing our refugee systems to simply get into the country, saying that their is not a problem is an understatement. Not only this, but the aversion nowadays to having kids is also quickly shifting our population to be more brown and less white.
Link to prove my point: here
Now, what is the problem with America not becoming white anymore? That should be a good thing... right? The fact that whiteness is seen as a perversion, an oppressive force that anyone not white has to deal with is an outright disgrace. Somehow because I am of European descent, I'm a bad person and can't at all be proud of my ancestral heritage. Because of these changing demographics, it is not only predicted that whites will become a minority in America by 2043, but also that after that time Republicans will have no chance of ever winning an election ever again. If you think thats a good thing, good for you, but I think that a game without any competition is a bad game. Also, who's to say what the Democrats will be pushing for in 2043. Pedophile rights? Global government? Communism?
Maybe I am overeating, and maybe me thinking of the preservation of the white race as a positive thing is bad, but I really don't see why. Leave your thoughts in the comments.
Sunday, November 18, 2018
Saturday, November 10, 2018
Swallowing the Red Pill: Indoctrination
Cultural Marxist indoctrination in our schools is ruining this country and our society as a whole. With so much of teachers nowadays being low-paid workers who tend to vote democrat, it is no wonder that none of our kids are getting the education they truly deserve. Indeed, kids nowadays aren't taught to think for themselves about issues, but rather accept whatever the teacher is saying as unadulterated fact. Take this teacher for example:
Its appalling that teachers nowadays will have the audacity to talk as if they understand everything about everything and all the students should just shut up and listen because they are the alpha in the room. I mean, just last year one of my teachers tried to convince me the wage gap was true, and when I called her out she told me to shut up. Now that I got that rant out of the way, now I can get into the logistics of my argument.
The fact of the matter is students, your teachers do not know everything. Being a teacher for most people is a last resort instead of an overall goal. Our society treats teachers like replaceable objects to teach our children. This is in high contrast to other countries like Finland, where being a teacher is hard and a respectable career choice for the best in a field. Please note that I am not calling our particular teachers, because many teachers in our school are more like the Finland teachers as opposed to most American teachers, but that still doesn't change the fact that being a teacher is not the valued position it should be. With the teacher position being undervalued, many teachers tend to make less than any most other jobs in their field would have made (eg: being a science teacher pays way less than being an actual scientist). Because of this disparity in earnings, two-thirds of all teachers become part of labor unions. The fact that many teachers are in labor unions may seem insignificant, however this becomes much more significant when you take into account correlation between being a labor union member and voting democrat.
The majority of teachers being democrat archetypes may not have much of an impact on the surface, but remember how much time your kids are spending with these people everyday. Instead of being able to think about traditional gender roles as biological fact vs simply stereotypes, most kids are instead told that any feelings of femininity or masculinity are toxic stereotypes that don't apply to anyone. This impact generally has a bigger impact on girls, mostly because they are seen as "oppressed" by the boys, even though women were never oppressed at all (Before women's suffrage, men with kids were meant to be a representation of a complete family unit. First wave feminism was simply a shift from a more family-based society to a more individualist meritocracy). Because of this toxic view of men, girls get tend to get special treatment and better grades than their male counterparts. Boys are taught to be nice and quiet, and when they simply express their masculinity they are diagnosed with "ADHD" and given pills to force them to be subservient. One of the worst changes to modern schools was the recent anti-bullying campaigns. Of course some types of bullying are definitely harassment and are a violation of one's rights, however this movement has also been used to censor "locker room talk" as some kind of violent assault.
Some other examples of things kids should just take their teachers word on and not think for themselves are issues like diversity, inclusion, immigration, and gay marriage. While I'm not saying any of these are necessarily bad traits, they are complicated issues that kids need to think about for themselves and make up their own minds on. Simply being told "Diversity good! White people bad..." makes a huge impact on kids futures and decisions. Kids minds are malleable, and currently our culture doesn't have countermeasures in place to reduce the amount of political indoctrination faced by our students.
Sorry about that, but it needed to be said. In our classroom alone, the effects of years and years of constant indoctrination and the same perspective has shaped some of my peers minds into autonomous machines that spit out the same rhetoric as if what they say are indisputable cultural axioms. Unlearn what you have learned.
Its appalling that teachers nowadays will have the audacity to talk as if they understand everything about everything and all the students should just shut up and listen because they are the alpha in the room. I mean, just last year one of my teachers tried to convince me the wage gap was true, and when I called her out she told me to shut up. Now that I got that rant out of the way, now I can get into the logistics of my argument.
The fact of the matter is students, your teachers do not know everything. Being a teacher for most people is a last resort instead of an overall goal. Our society treats teachers like replaceable objects to teach our children. This is in high contrast to other countries like Finland, where being a teacher is hard and a respectable career choice for the best in a field. Please note that I am not calling our particular teachers, because many teachers in our school are more like the Finland teachers as opposed to most American teachers, but that still doesn't change the fact that being a teacher is not the valued position it should be. With the teacher position being undervalued, many teachers tend to make less than any most other jobs in their field would have made (eg: being a science teacher pays way less than being an actual scientist). Because of this disparity in earnings, two-thirds of all teachers become part of labor unions. The fact that many teachers are in labor unions may seem insignificant, however this becomes much more significant when you take into account correlation between being a labor union member and voting democrat.
The majority of teachers being democrat archetypes may not have much of an impact on the surface, but remember how much time your kids are spending with these people everyday. Instead of being able to think about traditional gender roles as biological fact vs simply stereotypes, most kids are instead told that any feelings of femininity or masculinity are toxic stereotypes that don't apply to anyone. This impact generally has a bigger impact on girls, mostly because they are seen as "oppressed" by the boys, even though women were never oppressed at all (Before women's suffrage, men with kids were meant to be a representation of a complete family unit. First wave feminism was simply a shift from a more family-based society to a more individualist meritocracy). Because of this toxic view of men, girls get tend to get special treatment and better grades than their male counterparts. Boys are taught to be nice and quiet, and when they simply express their masculinity they are diagnosed with "ADHD" and given pills to force them to be subservient. One of the worst changes to modern schools was the recent anti-bullying campaigns. Of course some types of bullying are definitely harassment and are a violation of one's rights, however this movement has also been used to censor "locker room talk" as some kind of violent assault.
Some other examples of things kids should just take their teachers word on and not think for themselves are issues like diversity, inclusion, immigration, and gay marriage. While I'm not saying any of these are necessarily bad traits, they are complicated issues that kids need to think about for themselves and make up their own minds on. Simply being told "Diversity good! White people bad..." makes a huge impact on kids futures and decisions. Kids minds are malleable, and currently our culture doesn't have countermeasures in place to reduce the amount of political indoctrination faced by our students.
Sorry about that, but it needed to be said. In our classroom alone, the effects of years and years of constant indoctrination and the same perspective has shaped some of my peers minds into autonomous machines that spit out the same rhetoric as if what they say are indisputable cultural axioms. Unlearn what you have learned.
Saturday, November 3, 2018
Swallowing the Red Pill: Gender Roles
So I hear a lot of people complaining about "stereotypes" among genders, trying to make themselves feel some kind of non-existing oppression for acting according to their natural instincts. For millennia men and women have worked side by side to progress us where we are. Men had the role of inventing, discovering, and philosophizing, and women had equally important roles of continuing our species. And yet all that has simply been thrown out of the window. In place of our companionship and roles of working together, we instead fight constantly. I mean, men and women are always at each other's throats nowadays. If it's not feminists, its incels, radfems, TERFs, MGTOWs, WGTOWs, or anti-feminists. Men and women talk about each other not as friends, or companions, but instead as disposable objects ready to be thrown away when one gets tired of the other. Divorce rates are at an all time high, women's and men's overall happiness has plummeted, both genders whine about their gender being the oppressed one and how the other gender should be responsible for catering towards their whims.
Listen, guys and girls, we have been messed with. We are not responsible for ruining our gender dynamic, our teachers (aka: indoctrinaters) are responsible for teaching us from a young age that an egalitarian marriage should be something everyone should strive too. For anyone not in the know, an egalitarian marriage is a marriage where both partners work equal hours and then get home and do an equal amount of housework. Without getting into much detail, many women in there marriages often complain about how their husbands often under-perform in intimate interactions, mostly due to them unable to see their husbands as strong and dominant after they just vacuumed all the floors and washed all the sinks. 50 years ago, it would be highly uncommon in high school to see any women with short pixie cuts, and it would be equally as unlikely to see men with feminine and delicate features.
There are many reasons why gender roles are beneficial for society, but one of the best reasons for men and women returning to 1950s gender dynamics is that it is simply in our nature to have a society structured around each gender's weaknesses and strengths. Some Neo-Marxists would like to tell you that early humans were polygamous and matriarchal, but the historical evidence shows no signs of this ever being the case, rather early human society was monogamous and red-pilled. Women and children gathered berries and stayed near camp, while the men went out to hunt.
The common rebuttal heard when arguing for a red-pill society is that the idea itself is inherently misogynistic. I myself am not total red-pill because I believe that some women are more cut out to be breadwinners and some men are more cut out to be housewives, but since this is rare most red-pill individuals don't bother covering this rare case. Ironically, most red-pill men value women over men, because a woman's uterus makes her automatically more valuable than every man she ever meets. Men have more strength and skills than women because they need to spend their entire lives working on building the same social worth for himself that all women have.
Pursuing egalitarian genders roles has left both men and women confused in the dating world. Many men will try to find themselves a good women by degrading himself and telling them how much of a feminist he is and how much he respects women. Women will earn great degrees and have amazing high paying jobs, yet question why every man they meet is intimidated by them.
In summary, women should be women and men should be men.
Good day.
Listen, guys and girls, we have been messed with. We are not responsible for ruining our gender dynamic, our teachers (aka: indoctrinaters) are responsible for teaching us from a young age that an egalitarian marriage should be something everyone should strive too. For anyone not in the know, an egalitarian marriage is a marriage where both partners work equal hours and then get home and do an equal amount of housework. Without getting into much detail, many women in there marriages often complain about how their husbands often under-perform in intimate interactions, mostly due to them unable to see their husbands as strong and dominant after they just vacuumed all the floors and washed all the sinks. 50 years ago, it would be highly uncommon in high school to see any women with short pixie cuts, and it would be equally as unlikely to see men with feminine and delicate features.
There are many reasons why gender roles are beneficial for society, but one of the best reasons for men and women returning to 1950s gender dynamics is that it is simply in our nature to have a society structured around each gender's weaknesses and strengths. Some Neo-Marxists would like to tell you that early humans were polygamous and matriarchal, but the historical evidence shows no signs of this ever being the case, rather early human society was monogamous and red-pilled. Women and children gathered berries and stayed near camp, while the men went out to hunt.
The common rebuttal heard when arguing for a red-pill society is that the idea itself is inherently misogynistic. I myself am not total red-pill because I believe that some women are more cut out to be breadwinners and some men are more cut out to be housewives, but since this is rare most red-pill individuals don't bother covering this rare case. Ironically, most red-pill men value women over men, because a woman's uterus makes her automatically more valuable than every man she ever meets. Men have more strength and skills than women because they need to spend their entire lives working on building the same social worth for himself that all women have.
Pursuing egalitarian genders roles has left both men and women confused in the dating world. Many men will try to find themselves a good women by degrading himself and telling them how much of a feminist he is and how much he respects women. Women will earn great degrees and have amazing high paying jobs, yet question why every man they meet is intimidated by them.
In summary, women should be women and men should be men.
Good day.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Swallowing the Red Pill: Immigration and Nationalism
Oh boy, I'm going to get a lot of hate for this, but it needs to be said. In the first chapter of "The Great Gatsby", Tom comm...